Edmonton lawyer’s conduct led to interrupt down of Northlands case, courtroom docket paperwork current

A multi-million dollar wrongful dismissal and defamation trial collapsed because of the conduct of the lawyer representing former Edmonton Northlands cashiers, courtroom docket paperwork current.

This week, CBC Info opposed an software program to fully seal affidavits plaintiffs had filed about Glenda Pidde, who represented 19 fired Northlands parking suppliers cashiers for larger than six years, and a publication ban on a mistrial software program.

“Most of the people has a correct to know regarding the causes for the top results of the case,” talked about CBC lawyer Tess Layton all through oral arguments Wednesday.

Six sworn affidavits had been prepared. The plaintiffs’ new lawyer requested Courtroom of Queen’s Bench Justice Tom Rothwell to fully seal the paperwork and to order a publication ban on their mistrial software program.

Arguing on behalf of the plaintiffs, lawyer Philip Prowse talked about the affidavits could embarrass Pidde. He described her habits as “atrocious” and “nothing even close to expert.”

On Friday, Justice Rothwell decided in favor of the CBC, dismissing the plaintiff’s request for a publication ban and sealing order.

“Sustaining the open courtroom docket principle does not pose a extreme risk to her privateness or endanger her bodily or psychological nicely being,” Rothwell talked about.

No trial preparation

The plaintiffs claimed of their sworn affidavits that they’d been on no account accurately prepared for trial.

They described meeting with Pidde on March 6 on the Edmonton Inn. The lawyer demanded the group act as cheerleaders by repeatedly chanting, “We’re gonna win.”

On March 17, the group met on the Victoria golf course. Angela Pegg, in her affidavit, claimed the lawyer supplied no trial preparation.

“[Pidde] wanted us to face in a circle around her whereas stomping our ft. She wanted the plaintiffs to call her ‘The Fundamental,'” Pegg talked about.

Plaintiff Janet Roberts claimed in her affidavit that Pidde “danced to music for lots of the meeting.”

Plaintiffs Ann Handfield and Janet Roberts, confirmed proper right here, filed affidavits about Pidde. (Peter Evans/CBC)

At 11:29 pm the night sooner than the trial began, Pidde despatched Pegg an electronic message saying she was taking marijuana capsules and requested Pegg to current her a wake-up identify the following morning.

Spherical midnight, Pidde despatched one different electronic message, saying she had started consuming wine.

“If I odor of alcohol or appear stoned, inform me. Ship gum or mouthwash for many who assume it will help,” she talked about.

On the first full day of the trial, Pidde made a wide-ranging opening assertion that included accusations that Northlands had destroyed proof, and lied to its staff and most of the people about what occurred.

The resolve always reminded her to cope with the lawyer representing Northlands with expert respect.

If I odor of alcohol or appear stoned, inform me.– Glenda Pidde in an electronic message

After courtroom docket ended for the day, Pegg drove Pidde home.

She claimed Pidde requested to stop at a liquor retailer, the place she bought a bottle of wine, and a marijuana dispensary, the place she purchased 20 packs of edibles and three cans of marijuana-infused drinks.

Plaintiffs fed up with lawyer’s conduct

By Day 3 of the trial, the plaintiffs had had adequate.

A wide range of them decided to place in writing a observe to the resolve, asking to speak to him about their lawyer’s conduct.

“Ms. Pidde did not want to talk to us and I did not know what to do,” Roberts talked about.

Afterward, exterior the courtroom, Pidde tried intimidating her by twice bumping her chest into that of Roberts, she talked about.

“Ms. Pidde was erratic and offended,” Roberts talked about.

She talked about Pidde snatched the first observe Roberts tried at hand to the clerk and crumpled it up, nevertheless Roberts wrote one different observe that was handed alongside to the resolve.

In her affidavit, Pegg linked a reproduction of an electronic message Pidde despatched her on March 31.

“I’ll in all probability be asking the Justice to withdraw me as your counsel at 1:30…You have harm me, abused and embarrassed me in a courtroom docket of laws. I am achieved,” Pidde talked about inside the electronic message.

When the resolve gave Pidde time to speak to her purchasers exterior the courtroom, Roberts talked about Pidde knowledgeable her purchasers to “F—okay off,” then entered the courtroom docket and knowledgeable Justice Rothwell that she wanted off the case.

“Ms. Pidde quitting in the midst of trial made me actually really feel anxious, confused and scared. I did not know whether or not or not I, along with the alternative plaintiffs, may be given an excellent trial,” Roberts wrote.

Edmonton lawyer Glenda Pidde in an undated {{photograph}}. (411.ca)

After the trial collapsed, Pidde continued to ship Roberts “bizarre, racist, threatening textual content material messages.”

The Regulation Society of Alberta was unable to say if it has obtained any complaints about Pidde or if her conduct is being investigated.

Civil lawsuit now on keep

On Friday afternoon, the lawyer representing Northlands urged Justice Rothwell to declare an adjournment.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer needs a mistrial and a model new resolve.

Rothwell talked about he’ll downside a written decision, likely in July.

Scroll to Top